Energy Saving Tip 1

Change all your lightbulbs to Energy Saving Compact Fluorescents.

Absolute Energy Solutions

Absolute Energy Solutions

free counters
Case Study 5 - Water Heating for Low Rise PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bryce   
Monday, 25 October 2010 10:21

Thirlestane Project

 

Business Problem Statement

The case study refers to a small 3 storey apartment block in the Johannesburg area, used for social housing. The present boiler is outdated and needs to be replaced. At the same time, energy savings need to be implemented.

 

Technical Situation

Building:

 

Storeys:

3

Apartments:

25

Persons:

75

 

Analysis of Energy Requirements

Water Heating

Note that costs are illustrative, based on simple principles. When designing heat pumps, we use simulation models. These show appreciably greater savings than we have presented here.

No of Persons

75

 

Hot Water Per Person Per Day

50

litres

Hot Water Temperature

55

deg C

Avg Inlet Temperature Winter

8

deg C

Avg Inlet Temperature Summer

20

deg C

Boiler Efficiency

0.8

 

kCal to kWh Conversion

1.16E-003

 

Operational Hours per Day

15

 

 

 

Winter

Summer

 

Boiler

Heat Pump

Boiler

Heat Pump

Litres Demand/Day

3500

 

3500

 

kCal Demand/Day

164500

 

122500

 

kWh per day required

153

69

113

46.02

kW Rating

10.2

4.6

10.2

4.6

 

(Usage in Summer is approx 2/3)

Avg kWh saved daily

75.49

 

 

 

Annual kWh saved

27572.17

 

 

 

 

Solution

Any form of direct heating, whether Gas, Oil or Electric has a similar cost structure, and because electricity in South Africa is predominantly coal fired, all have a detrimental effect on the environment. Solar heating is not an option in this case, because of lack of area (3 storeys to support). Heat pumps operate on the principle of moving energy from hot molecules in the air to cold molecules in the water being heated – this is a very much more efficient process than trying to speed up molecules in the water using a heating element.

 

Assessed Benefits of the Proposed Solution

Cash Flow - Heating

 

Boiler Cost Alone

R 46 300

Heat Pump Cos + Boiler Hc

R 80 300

kWh Saved Annually

27 572

R/kWh

0.63

Opportunity Cost

R 34 000

Discount Rate

0.12

Escalation rate

0.15

 

Year

Yield – Loss of Opportunity

Annual Electricity Saving- Rands

Cash Flow

Cumulative

1

R 38,080.00

R 17,370.36

R-20,709.64

R 20,709.64

2

R 4,569.60

R 19,975.91

R 15,406.31

R-5,303.33

3

R 5,117.95

R 22,972.30

R 17,854.35

R 33,260.66

4

R 5,732.11

R 26,418.15

R 20,686.04

R 38,540.39

5

R 6,419.96

R 30,380.87

R 23,960.91

R 44,646.95

 

Intangible Benefits

Reduction of Carbon Dioxide ( 27 600 kg per annum), Sulphur Dioxide and other pollutants.

 

Products and Services used in the solution

 

Heat Pump and Boiler

Heat Pump and Boiler used at Thirlestane

Results

The Client accepted the benefits of installing a Heat Pump to conserve energy and the project is complete. Actual consumption figures will be presented in due course.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 09:36
 
 
Simplweb - Joomla 1.5 Website Hosts