Energy Saving Tip 9
Use warm clothing instead of turning the heating up.

Absolute Energy Solutions

Absolute Energy Solutions

free counters
Case Study 1 - Efficient Energy for Upmarket Residential PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bryce   
Monday, 30 August 2010 08:27
Stuttafords project

 

Client Profile

Units under management provide affordable; safe and well maintained value for money accommodation in an environment where tenants can feel proud of their homes. This is achieved through maintaining good relationships and communication with the tenant base, enforcing building rules, preventing overcrowding and noise pollution, and through effective building maintenance.

 

Business Problem Statement

The building is located in Johannesburg central. It was historically a commercial building which is now being renovated to accommodate upmarket residential apartments.

The renovation had to include the maximum energy savings possible, consistent with acceptable aesthetics.

 

Technical Situation

Building:

Central Jhb

Storeys:

8

Apartments:

133

Persons:

399

 

Analysis of Energy Requirements

1. Water Heating

No of Persons

399

 

Hot Water Per Person Per Day

60

litres

Hot Water Temperature

60

deg C

Avg Inlet Temperature Winter

5

deg C

Avg Inlet Temperature Summer

20

deg C

Boiler Efficiency

0.8

 

kCal to kWh Conversion

1.16E-003

 

Operational Hours per Day

15

 

 

 

Winter

Summer

 

Boiler

Heat Pump

Boiler

Heat Pump

Litres Demand/Day

23940

 

23940

 

kCal Demand/Day

1316700

 

957600

 

kWh per day required

1225

552

890

414

kW Rating

81.67

36.8

59.33

27.6

 

 

 

 

 

Avg kWh saved daily

574.5

 

 

 

Annual kWh saved

209836.13

 

 

 

 

2. Lighting

Essentially, the lighting solution consists of energy – efficient CFL lamps and induction lamps as well as corridor sensors. The installation costs and annual savings are summarised below:

Description

Total Cost

Annual Savings – kWh compared to Incandescent etc

Rand Savings Year 1

Floor 2

R 224 074.60

50 320.36

R 31 701.83

Floor 3

R 224 136.10

50 066.32

R 31 541.78

Floor 4

R 223 459.10

67 455.22

R 42 496.79

Floor 5

R 217 630.60

49 812.28

R 31 381.74

Floor 6

R 218 178.60

49 812.28

R 31 381.74

Floor 7

R 186 830.30

39 577.68

R 24 933.94

Floor 8

R 155 323.80

33 419.4

R 21 054.22

Floor 9

R 151 011.40

32 911.32

R 20 734.13

Total

R 1 621 164.50

373 374.86

R 235 226.16

 

Solution

Heating

Gas, Oil, Coal and other forms of direct heating all have comparable costs to direct heating by electricity – the alternative that we are comparing against.

Solar heating was not considered because it is not feasible for high-rise apartments and in urban areas where there is insufficient area to provide adequate heat collection.

Heat pumps work by moving heat, in this case from hot molecules in the atmosphere to cold molecules inside the hot water supply using the same principles as a refrigerator. Moving heat is very much ore efficient than generating it in the first place and savings of 50 to 60% are routinely achieved compared to direct heating by electricity.

Lighting

Compact fluorescent lamps remain one of the most energy efficient and cost-effective forms of residential lighting. The CFL downlights provide a considerable saving compared to halogen (50W) whilst maintaining a low level of glare. The Induction fittings used in the public areas are reasonably energy efficient and will discourage theft.

The only upcoming alternative to CFL technology is LED, but at present is not acceptable in terms of light quality or cost.

Sensors

Passive infra-red sensors have been included in the overall solution in public areas where they can save money by only providing lighting when needed.

 

Assessed Benefits of the Proposed Solution

Cash Flow - Heating

Boiler Cost

R 376 200

Heat Pump Cost

R 565 200

kWh Saved Annually

209836

R/kWh

0.63

Opportunity Cost

R 189 000

Discount Rate

0.12

Escalation rate

0.15

 

Year

Yield – Loss of Opportuity

Annual Elec Saving- Rands

Cash Flow

Cumulative

1

R 211 680

R 132196.68

R -79 483.32

R -79 483.32

2

R 25 401.6

R 152026.18

R 126 624.58

R 47 141.26

3

R 28 449.79

R 174830.11

R 146 380.32

R 273 004.9

4

R 31 863.77

R 201 054.63

R 169 190.86

R 315 571.18

5

R 35 687.42

R 231 212.82

R 195 525.4

R 364 716.26

 

Cash Flow - Lighting

The small additional cost of providing CFL lamps compared to incandescent is ignored in the analysis, since the bulk of the cost is that of providing wiring and fittings.

kWh Saved Annually

373374.86

R/kWh

0.63

Escalation rate

0.15

 

Year

Annual Elec Saving- Rands

1

R 235,226.16

2

R 270,510.09

3

R 311,086.60

4

R 357,749.59

5

R 411,412.03

Total

R 1,585,984.46

 

Total Savings – 5 Year = R 364 716.26+R 1,585,984.46 = R 1 950 700.72

Intangible Benefits

Reduction of Carbon Dioxide ( 743384 kg), Sulphur Dioxide (5866 kg) and Total Savings – 5 Year = other pollutants.

 

Products and Services used in the solution

 

Induction Light

Heat Pump

PIR detector

Induction Lighting

  • Consistent Light Output
  • Non Interchangeable
Deron Heat PumpsB.E.G Luxomat Detectors

Flush Populated DB

LS Moulded Circuit Breaker

Lear Switch and Socket

LS Flush Populated DBLS Moulded Circuit BreakersLear Switches and Sockets

 

 

 

Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 08:43
 
 
Simplweb - Joomla 1.5 Website Hosts